Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Puppy buying report launched at Westminster
puppies
"Puppy farming dogs, breeding high volumes of puppies, are abhorrent practices to British puppy buyers."
Findings provide fresh insight into puppy buying habits

Nearly a fifth of dog owners say their puppy experienced a health or welfare problem shortly after purchase, according to a report recently launched in Westminster.

The report follows a year-long survey of the British public's puppy-buying habits. It was led by a coalition of anti-puppy farming organisations, including Cariad and TV vet Marc Abraham's Pup Aid.

Of more than 4,000 responses from dog owners, nearly 45 per cent had bought their puppy from one of the online classified sites - predominantly Pets4Homes (30 per cent).

While Pets4Homes adheres to the PAAG minimum standards for online classified ads, authors of the report had concerns that adverts by commercial sellers are likely to be premium and therefore more prominent, whereas small scale responsible sellers often do not need to advertise as they have such long waiting lists. They suggest more work needs to be done to educate the public about irresponsible ads.

Almost 80 per cent of people believed they had seen the pup with its mother, but 18 per cent had not and 3 per cent thought the mother they saw may have been a 'fake'.

Out of those dog owners whose pets became sick shortly after arriving home and required veterinary treatment, the majority (66 per cent) paid less than £200. But over a fifth paid £201 to £1,000, while 6 per cent paid in excess of £3,000. And just over 70 per cent of these did not take any action against the seller.

Interestingly, whether or not a seller was licensed did not rank highly in the list of reasons for choosing a particular seller - coming in seventh out of 10.

Comments supplied with the survey responses indicate that those buyers who took part would not intentionally buy from a low welfare supplier. Eight per cent of respondents suspected their pet had come from a puppy farm and were angry and upset that they had been duped.

Commenting on the report's launch, Marc Abraham said: "The interest shown by so many MPs about the plight of puppy farmed dogs is heartening, we were impressed by the level of engagement in the findings of our survey.

"What is clear from the feedback we got from the survey is that puppy farming dogs, breeding high volumes of puppies, are abhorrent practices to British puppy buyers, they demand higher welfare for their puppies, which is why I won't stop campaigning for #wheresmum".

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.