Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Royal visit reopens ‘shoot to kill’ debate
Tigers
The Kaziranga national park has the highest density of tigers in any protected area of the world.

Kaziranga wildlife park comes under constant attack from poachers

An official visit by The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to a wildlife reserve in India has reignited the debate over the park’s policy of shooting suspected poachers.

Bordering the Brahmaputra river in north-east India, the Kaziranga national park is highly regarded by conservationists. Not only does it hold two-thirds of the world’s remaining one-horned rhinos, but it also has the highest density of tigers in any protected area.

But despite the park’s good reputation of protecting endangered wildlife, it comes under constant under attack from armed poachers, who can earn up to $20,000 for a single horn. While its many guards successfully deter much of the poaching, the Kaziranga has become notorious for its controversial policy of “shoot-to-kill”.

According to figures published by the Indian government, 66 suspected poachers were killed by guards in the park between 2005-2012 and over 500 were arrested.

In a statement, Stephen Corry from Survival International, said that local tribal people are becoming increasingly caught up in the 'militarization' of wildlife policing around the world.

“This is the perfect opportunity for Prince William to speak out against summary executions carried out in the name of conservation. Extrajudicial killings should have no place in conservation today.  

“Why aren’t the big conservation organisationsloudly condemning this kind of knee-jerk brutality? Instead, they’re supporting anti-tribal conservation policies, which play right into the hands of the gangsters who are running international poaching rings. Targeting tribespeople diverts action away from tackling the true poachers. Itharms conservation.”

But Bishan Signh Bonal, who was head of Kaziranga national park last year, has defended the policy. Speaking to Indian magazine Sanctuary Asia in 2015, he said:

“Our determination and almost religious belief that protecting the rhino is the only reason to live. It’s open war when poachers enter Kaziranga. If they see our guards, they fire to kill, so we have no option but to retaliate. As many as 66 poachers lost their lives over a 15-year period and more than 500 were arrested for poaching. We recovered more than 70 rhino horns. You can well imagine how much stress all this involves.”

But conservation groups like the International Animal Rescue Foundation believe that shoot-to-kill must the very last policy, and should only be considered if every other option has been exhausted. 

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge visited the Kaziranga national park on Wednesday (13 April) where they were taken on an open-top safari.

Their visit forms part of a seven-day tour of India and Bhutan.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.