Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

New guidelines to prevent pig tail docking
pig
Under the new recommendation, enrichment materials are classified as 'optimal', 'suboptimal' and 'of marginal interest'.
Farmers advised to carry out risk assessments

The European Commission (EC) has published new best practice guidelines to help reduce the need for tail docking in pigs.

The practice of tail docking is carried out to prevent tail biting - an abnormal behaviour with multi-factorial causes.

EU legislation requires member countries to ensure tail docking is not carried out routinely, but only when there is evidence of injuries to sows' teats or other pigs' ears or tails. British producers are required to reduce the need to tail dock by making adjustments to the environment and husbandry.

The recommendation has been released at the same time as a paper on best practice in providing enrichment materials to prevent tail biting.

Both papers have been produced in response to a drive by animal welfare organisations to ensure member states adhere to pig welfare rules. There are also concerns that husbandry systems differ between member states, meaning there is a need for best practice advice.

Under the new recommendation, enrichment materials are classified as 'optimal', 'suboptimal' and 'of marginal interest'. Suboptimal materials should be used in combination with other materials, while those of marginal interest are likely to provide distraction for pigs, but must be used with optimal or suboptimal materials.

Farmers should carry out a tail biting risk assessment, according to the recommendation. This should take into account: enrichment materials provided, cleanliness, thermal comfort and air quality, health status, competition for food and space and diet.

Based on this assessment, farmers should consider making any relevant changes, such as providing enrichment materials, comfortable environmental conditions, assuring good health status and/or providing a balanced diet.

The UK's National Pig Association says it will discuss the paper with Defra to ensure the government's response takes into account the multifactorial causes of tail-biting.

For more information, see: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016H0336

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.