Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Over one million pets given human medication
Tablets
On average owners admitted to giving their animals human medication seven times in the last 12 months.

Owners self-medicating their animals to avoid vet fees

Over one million pet owners have given their animals toxic human medication - including diet pills - new research has found.

A survey conducted by More Than Insurance reveals that a staggering 1.4 million cat and dog owners in the UK have self-medicated their pets using human drugs.

The most common medicines are anti-histamines, paracetamol, antiseptic creams, ibuprofen, and aspirin.

On average owners admitted to giving their animals human medication seven times in the last 12 months.  

Pet claims veterinary consultant, Andrew Moore, said: "Pet owners risk significant harm to their pet’s wellbeing by giving them medicines designed for humans with liver failure and kidney damage among a litany of potential health complications that arise from seemingly harmless over the counter products.
 
“Alongside medication purpose-designed for animals, as vets we may actually also use forms of human medication in the treatment of veterinary patients. However, dosing and delivery is everything, and only a veterinary professional can know the safe quantity of any medicine to administer to an animal.”

Reasons given for using human drugs were to avoid incurring vet costs, or to give their pet some form of quick pain relief. Almost 30 per cent of respondents thought that over the counter human medications were actually safe to give their animals.

Furthermore, it would seem that cats and dogs don’t need to be feeling unwell for their owners to feed them human health products.
A staggering one in 20 owners admitted to giving their pets protein shakes, bars and diet pills in a bid to improve their animal’s body shape.

Twenty one per cent believed they would help their pets get in shape, while 40 per cent felt it would help their pet lose weight faster.

"Dogs and cats do need a specific amount of protein, but they need it from certain whole food sources, such as meat,” said Andrew.
“Protein shakes and bars contain sources of protein that are not found in nature and are potentially inappropriate for animals.

“Cats and dogs have different dietary requirements and therefore may respond poorly to being fed artificial protein and other exercise supplements. It goes without saying that diet pills and certain vitamins that are intended for human consumption shouldn’t be given to a pet, but even seemingly innocuous health products, like protein powder, should also be given a wide berth when it comes to a pet’s nutrition.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.