Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

'New approach needed' for pet custody battles
Labrador
Mrs Rook argues that most pet owners view their animals as a member of the family, not as personal property such as a car or piece of furniture.
Law expert says pets should not be treated simply as property
 
So-called 'pet custody battles' should take into account the best interests of the animal, an expert in animal law has said.

Deborah Rook, a principal lecturer at Northumbria Law School, says the current law is inadequate at a time when more and more divorcing couples are seeking legal advice to resolve custody disputes about pets.

The current law treats domestic pets as personal property and a property law test is used to resolve disputes over custody.

In her new paper - Who Gets Charlie? The Emergence of Pet Custody Disputes in Family Law - Mrs Rook argues that most pet owners view their animals as a member of the family, not as personal property such as a car or piece of furniture.

Courts in England and Wales should take a more flexible approach, she continues, perhaps by adopting a 'best interests of the animal' test, which some courts in the US and Israel are already using.

While disputes of this kind are a growing problem, Mrs Rook says law students are not taught about the issue.

"Pet custody is not discussed at law schools when students are learning about family law and there is nothing in student text books.

"It's an issue that is becoming more prominent - not just among celebrities but for other people - and I think the current law is inadequate to decide cases fairly."

Animal charity The Blue Cross has recommended that pet owners enter into a 'pet nup' - a pre-nuptial agreement for pets - before they get married. The charity recently partnered with divorce lawyers Lloyd & Platt Company to reduce the number of pets caught in marital disputes.

Mrs Rook says this is further proof that the law needs to be updated. As part of her research she is now looking to speak to couples who are fighting for custody of their pets, or have done so in the past.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.