Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Could burrowing owls protect us from the plague?
Burrowing owl
As well as their cute and fluffy appearance, burrowing owls also have an endearing habit of lining their nests with mammal dung.

Species immune to plague bacteria

Western burrowing owls living alongside mammals that are prone to catching the plague are not infected with the bacteria that causes the disease, according to a study led by Boise State University.

The finding, reported by Wired, presents scientists with the opportunity to test if burrowing owls could protect humans from this deadly infection.

A species of conservation concern throughout many western states, burrowing owls nest underground, often re-using the burrows of rodents. As well as their cute and fluffy appearance, burrowing owls also have an endearing habit of lining their nests with mammal dung. It is thought that the poo attracts insects that the owls feed on.

Biologist Dr. Jim Belthoff from Boise State University has spent many years studying the creatures and noticed that the owls also seem to have a lot of fleas.

“We considered the fleas a nuisance, as they would jump on us as we captured and banded the owls, and they would infest our field vehicles,” he told Wired.

Jim knew that burrowing owls used ground squirrel and parry dog burrows -  both of which host fleas that carry the plague bacteria Yersinia Pestis. So, he and his team set out to discover how the fleas affected the owls and what kind of fleas they were.

After camping for many nights, collecting almost 6,000 fleas, the team found no evidence of the plague bacteria in the owl fleas they collected. They also didn't find any evidence of the plague bacteria in the owl's blood, which they would have expected if owls were regularly exposed.

Dr. Belthoff said: "There were no public health concerns relating to burrowing owls. All our test results were negative to plague - in antibodies, in the fleas, and in the blood."

Another research team looked into whether the mammal during surrounding the owl's nest attracted the fleas, however their tests showed that the owls were picking up the fleas, not from their nests, but possibly from rodent prey.

The researchers believe that fleas biting the owls might be less likely to bite other susceptible hosts. In this way, burrowing owls may take fleas infected with the bacteria out of circulation and slow down infection.

The team are now testing to see if owls could protect humans from the plague by examining the current ground squirrel plague outbreak. Fleas on the owls aren't feeding on the ground squirrels, and are therefore not picking up the infection or passing it on.

Image (C) Obsidian Soul/Wikimedia

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.