Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Anti-cruelty petition reaches 100k signatures
beagle
"We need tougher penalties for these crimes. People cannot play God and take the lives of our animals, it's not right, it's not humane and these crimes need stopping."

Campaigners call for tougher penalties for animal cruelty

An e-petition calling for tougher prison sentences for those who kill, bait or are cruel to animals has reached 100,000 signatures.

Closing on 30 March, the petition will be considered for debate by the Backbench Business Committee.

Elaine McCallion, who launched the petition, wants the government to "end the unnecessary suffering of our animals" by introducing greater penalties, including a lifetime ban on keeping animals, for those who engage in acts of cruelty to animals.

"I want to start a petition to raise awareness of all animals in the UK that are subjected to horrific deaths, baiting and acts of cruelty and neglect..." the petition states.

"We need tougher penalties for these crimes. People cannot play God and take the lives of our animals, it's not right, it's not humane and these crimes need stopping.

"Animals get such bad press and if they attack one time too many are put to sleep. So why should humans be allowed to get away with murdering, baiting and being cruel to our animals."

When the petition reached 10,000 signatures, the government published the following response: "The Government abhors animal cruelty. Powers for local authorities and police to investigate and take action in cases of suspected cruelty are provided in the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

"Under the 2006 Act, the maximum penalty for causing unnecessary suffering is a fine of £20,000 or six months imprisonment, or both. In addition, the court can impose post-conviction penalties on anyone found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal by disqualifying anyone from having any influence over the keeping of animals for as long as the court see fit."

To sign the petition, visit:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/63445P

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New form for online veterinary medicines retailers

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has produced a new online form for retailers wishing to sell veterinary medicines on the internet.

The form replace the previous Word version and is part of the VMD's ongoing commitment to digitise its processes. Anyone retailing prescription medicines online, including POM-V, POM-VPS and NFA-VPS categories, is lawfully required to register with the VMD before trading.

The change only applies to new applicants. Retailers already listed on the VMD's Register of Online Retailers or registered under the Accredited Internet Retailer Scheme (AIRS) do not need to do anything.