Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Anti-cruelty petition reaches 100k signatures
beagle
"We need tougher penalties for these crimes. People cannot play God and take the lives of our animals, it's not right, it's not humane and these crimes need stopping."

Campaigners call for tougher penalties for animal cruelty

An e-petition calling for tougher prison sentences for those who kill, bait or are cruel to animals has reached 100,000 signatures.

Closing on 30 March, the petition will be considered for debate by the Backbench Business Committee.

Elaine McCallion, who launched the petition, wants the government to "end the unnecessary suffering of our animals" by introducing greater penalties, including a lifetime ban on keeping animals, for those who engage in acts of cruelty to animals.

"I want to start a petition to raise awareness of all animals in the UK that are subjected to horrific deaths, baiting and acts of cruelty and neglect..." the petition states.

"We need tougher penalties for these crimes. People cannot play God and take the lives of our animals, it's not right, it's not humane and these crimes need stopping.

"Animals get such bad press and if they attack one time too many are put to sleep. So why should humans be allowed to get away with murdering, baiting and being cruel to our animals."

When the petition reached 10,000 signatures, the government published the following response: "The Government abhors animal cruelty. Powers for local authorities and police to investigate and take action in cases of suspected cruelty are provided in the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

"Under the 2006 Act, the maximum penalty for causing unnecessary suffering is a fine of £20,000 or six months imprisonment, or both. In addition, the court can impose post-conviction penalties on anyone found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal by disqualifying anyone from having any influence over the keeping of animals for as long as the court see fit."

To sign the petition, visit:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/63445P

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.