Cookie use on MRCVSonline
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
Send Cancel

Is this really a risk worth taking?
beagle and cat eating
A US study revealed 66 of 576 samples of raw dog or cat foods tested were positive for Listeria.

Should veterinary professionals be warning of the zoonotic risks of raw pet foods?

The Foods Standards Agency (FSA) has just published its ‘Food and You 2014’ survey report, based on information about peoples’ behaviours, attitudes and knowledge relating to food safety issues. It should prompt veterinary professionals to consider the advice they give to clients about feeding raw meat and poultry to their pets.

The survey, based on a sample of 3,453 interviews, provides data on people’s reports of their food purchasing, storage, preparation, consumption and factors that may affect these, such as eating habits, influences on where respondents choose to eat out and experiences of food poisoning.

Eight out of ten respondents reported cleaning behaviours in line with recommended practices, saying they always washed their hands before starting to prepare or cook food and after handling raw meat, poultry or fish.

Around half (51%) of those who reported storing raw meat and poultry in the fridge reported practices in line with those recommended to avoid cross contamination; and 49 per cent said they always used different chopping boards for different types of food.

Set against this FSA report, an article published in the September edition of Foodborne Pathogens and Disease entitled, ‘Investigation of Listeria, Salmonella, and toxigenic Escherichia coli in various pet foods’, should ring some alarm bells.

It reported that 66 of 576 samples of raw dog or cat foods tested in the US were positive for Listeria, including 32 that were positive for L. monocytogenes. In addition, 15 of the samples were positive for Salmonella and two were positive for Shiga toxin-producing E coli.

Not surprisingly, the authors conclude that consumers should handle these products carefully, being mindful of the potential risks to human and animal health.

This article is the latest in a series of studies warning of the problems associated with the feeding of raw pet foods – perhaps the most comprehensive recent overview being provided by Lisa Freeman and others at the end of 2013
[JAVMA 243(11) December 1, 2013].

The BARF (Biologically Appropriate Raw Food) and RMB (Raw Meaty Bones) lobbies and proponents of prepared pet foods continue to debate the health implications of their particular approaches to nutrition and the respective weight of scientific supporting data.  

Irrespective of this, isn’t there a more fundamental question as to the wisdom of introducing potentially contaminated food sources into the kitchen, unnecessarily, in the first place? And shouldn’t veterinary professionals be taking the lead in warning clients about it?

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Face covering rules expanded

News Story 1
 New rules came into force in England on Saturday (8 August) making it mandatory for clients to wear a face covering in veterinary practices.

The rules, which also apply to cinemas, museums and places of worship, follow a recent spike in coronavirus cases. All clients in England must now wear a face covering when inside a veterinary practice unless they are exempt for age, health or equality reasons. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BSAVA webinars to shine the spotlight on selected journal papers

A free series of webinars that take a closer look at selected papers published in the Journal of Small Animal Practice has been produced by the BSAVA.

In the new BSAVA Science webinar series, authors of the featured papers discuss their results with a panel and how they may impact clinical practice. The authors then answer questions submitted by audience members.

The webinars are available via the BSAVA Webinar Library, covering four different papers. JSAP editor Nicola Di Girolamo, said: "Discussing the research with the authors - experts in their field - really helps to bring the papers to life."