Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Whose responsibility is animal welfare?
James Yeates
James Yeates

Veterinary nurses are legally mandated – and morally and ethically required – to implement animal welfare

As well as being animal ambassadors, veterinary nurses have special responsibilities when it comes to animal welfare, RSPCA chief vet, James Yeates, told delegates on the final day of the BVNA Congress in Telford.

Some of these responsibilities are 'inherent' and others are 'undertaken'. They can be divided into those that are 'owned' by individuals, while others are 'shared' – either being divided or delegated. There are also opportunities to help others to fulfil their responsibilities – pet owners, for instance.

We have a duty not to harm and we are responsible if we fail to do something to prevent an animal suffering harm, even if we are not directly in charge of that animal or in control of it. Vet nurses have an increased duty of care and by taking on theIr professional role are more aware of welfare issues and take on additional legal and moral responsibilities.

Different responsibilities come together in veterinary practice in the guise of the different skill sets and interactions of veterinary surgeons and vet nurses. Professional status, legal privilege and being employed as a veterinary nurse impart specific responsibilities, especially as this technically 'prevents' other people from fulfilling their duty of care. Nurses and vets 'promise' to assume this responsibility when animals are committed to their care.

Nurses have special skills in terms of animal welfare and will invariably be better at it than vets. There are times when it is justifiable for them to speak out and to challenge vets regarding procedures – "tactfully, humbly and constructively" – and clients in the discharge of their duty of care. So, for example, by not pointing out to an owner that their dog is obese, that client could argue that they were not aware of the problem, because "the nurse didn't say anything".

Many owners do not realise that there is no 'halfway house' in terms of their responsibilities towards their pets. Once they take on an animal, they are morally, ethically and legally responsible for its welfare.

James Yeates recently contributed a Comment article in the Autumn 2014 issue of Veterinary Practice Today

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.