Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

RCVS Council members divided over delegation
mark elliott
Mark Elliott said the council "must be able to challenge decisions made by smaller groups."
Councillor raises concerns over the “possible sidelining” of the council's role

During last week's RCVS Council meeting, Mark Elliott raised concerns over the “possible sidelining” of the council's role as a result of delegation to committees.

At the June 5 meeting, council members had the opportunity to review changes made to the RCVS' governance structure in 2013.

Going forward, it was recommended that “papers for council meetings should not include minutes of committee meetings.”

Instead, committee chairmen would provide “written and oral updates at each council meeting”. It was proposed that minutes be copied to council, but not as part of the bundle of papers for council meetings.

However, councillor Mr Elliott said: “I think we are going to fast too soon”, adding that there is a risk that papers put to council would not be fully debated and the process for challenging decisions is “far too cumbersome”.

“If council is going to make a decision it must have the papers before it,” he said.

Mr Elliott said he has “quite a lot of concerns” about the number of powers being delegated to the operational board, referring to paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 of the council papers, stating that the board should appoint committee members, except chairmen and vice-chairman of the main committees.

While the council respects and trusts committee decisions, Mr Elliott stressed: “Council must be able to challenge the decisions made by smaller groups,” and without the diversity of council “how can we make the right decision?”

Similarly, Mr Stephenson said it is “very important” that council members receive the minutes of the committee meetings, as RCVS members “hold [the council] personally responsible for the decisions made.” He made particular reference to the recent backlash from the profession on the initial decision to remove certain post-nominals from the register – a decision which was overturned at the meeting this month.

The council unanimously agreed to change the recommendation to “papers for council meetings should include minutes of committee meetings.”

However, Mr Elliott proposed that decisions on committee matters should continue to be made by council, which president Neil Smith said would remove delegation.

RCVS CEO Nick Stace also raised concerns that this would take the college back to where it was a year ago, making it a “slow, cumbersome” organisation, for which it has previously been criticised.

Kit Sturgess said: “I feel very strongly that we have to make these delegations to move forward”. There were also concerns that committees could become “less relevant”, putting less time and effort into work that may not go forward.

Mr Elliott will submit a paper on the issue for discussion at the next council meeting in November.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Annual submission deadline small pet animal exemptions

News Story 1
 Companies marketing medicines for small pets exempt from authorisation must submit their annual return to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) by 30 November 2026.

Submitting this annual return ensures continued compliance with regulatory requirements for products marketed without a full Marketing Authorisation. The exemption specifically applies to products intended for animals, cage birds, terrarium animals, small rodents, ferrets and rabbits.

For further details and submission guidelines, visit the gov.uk website.  

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Bluetongue RZ extended across Scotland

The Scottish Government has announced an extension to a Bluetongue Restricted Zone that is in place in south-west Scotland.

From 3 October, the Restricted Zone will be extended to cover the whole of Scotland. The Animal, Plant and Health Agency (APHA) says this is in response to further disease spread, as well as simplify trading conditions ahead of the autumn.

Since the whole country will share a disease status, it will no longer be necessary to have a movement license to move susceptible livestock around the country. Restrictions on germinal products remain.

As of 1 October 2026, there were 1,979 cases of BTV-3 in England, 389 cases in Wales and 40 cases in Scotland.