Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

NOAH issues statement to clarify vaccination guidelines
Vet vaccinating Pekingese
NOAH says it has received many queries from practitioners about discrepancies on canine vaccinations.

NOAH statement aims to clear up discrepancies about canine vaccination

The National Office of Animal Health (NOAH) has issued a statement for veterinary surgeons on canine vaccination.

It discusses apparent discrepancies between global vaccination guidelines and advice contained within vaccine Summary of Product Characteristics (SPCs) and data sheets in the UK.

Following a recent publication from The World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA), entitled Vaccination Guidelines for New Puppy Owners, NOAH has received multiple queries from practitioners, seeking clarification regarding the messages it contains.

The statement clarifies that the publication is written from a global perspective. As many countries do not have the developed and educated companion animal market found in the UK, the available vaccines and their constituents and licensed claims are not universal across the globe.

Donal Murphy, NOAH technical executive and veterinary surgeon, explains: "NOAH members have received queries from practitioners seeking clarification when guidance written from a global perspective appears to differ from specific manufacturers' instructions, as set out in vaccine SPCs and data sheets in the UK.

"While there are some differences, we believe the profession within the UK has adopted many of the principles of the WSAVA guidance for some considerable time, such as annual health checks and determining individual requirements  in consultation with the owner."

NOAH welcomes any guidance assisting the veterinary profession in their determination of vaccine protocols, and helping to educate the public. Clarification is required on the routine use of non-core vaccines (particularly leptospirosis and kennel cough) and the role of serology testing to determine vaccination requirements and vaccine safety.

Mr Murphy says: "In the light of increased movement of pets from mainland Europe and beyond, the continued wide distribution of canine parvovirus and indeed the re-emergence of confirmed cases of canine distemper in a number of locations in the UK, the threat of infectious diseases to our pets is ever present and demands that a high level of vaccinal immunity is maintained across the country.

"It would be unfortunate if in seeking to provide 'best practice' advice on the use of vaccines, expert guidance was to lose sight of the need to maintain the confidence of both the pet owning public and indeed the veterinary profession itself in the continued value of the use of vaccines to keep significant infectious disease threats at bay."

NOAH believes the comment by the Veterinary Medicines Dictorate (VMD), responsible for the authorisation of veterinary medicines in the UK, sums up the value of vaccination to the health of our pets: '…the benefits of vaccination are considered significantly greater than the risks of infection by the ever present canine infectious diseases in the UK.'

Click here to view the statement.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.