Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

MPs vote against badger cull roll-out
Badger
A cross-party group of MPs said the pilot culls "decisively failed" to meet criteria.

Debate in Parliament sees 219 MPs vote against culling

MPs voted against a future roll-out of the badger culls at a parliamentary debate yesterday (March 13) urging the Government not to grant any further licenses.

Led by Mrs Anne Main, a cross-party group of MPs said in a motion for debate that pilot culls in Somerset and Gloucestershire had "decisively failed" to meet the criteria set by Defra.

Pilot badger culls were carried out in both areas last year as part of a programme to eradicate bovine TB (bTB). The Government has said previously that the culls may be rolled-out to other areas.

Pilots in both Somerset and Gloucestershire, however, failed to meet their targets to remove 70 per cent of badgers, despite being granted extensions to the six-week cull period.

In yesterday's debate, 219 MPs voted against a roll-out of the culls.

As well as failing to meet targets, the high financial cost of the culls was criticised, with policing costs, additional monitoring and expensive cage-and-trap methods "substantially" increasing the cost.

The decision to extend the pilots without a debate or vote in Parliament was also said to be regrettable, as was the fact that an Independent Expert Panel (IEP) will only assess the humaneness of the original cull period, not the extension.

Defra appointed the IEP to assess the humaneness, safety and effectiveness of the culls.

The BBC recently reported leaked findings from the IEP's report, indicating the cull failed on humaneness and effectiveness, with 18 per cent of culled badgers taking longer than five minutes to die. However, the report has not yet been officially published.

In yesterday's debate, 219 MPs urged the Government to halt the culls pending the development of alternative methods to eradicate bTB.

Commenting after the debate, executive director of the Humane Society International said: "Once again MPs have voted to halt the badger cull and now it’s time for the government to listen."

It has since been reported that the IEP's report has now been received by Defra's secretary of state Owen Paterson but will not be published until a decision has been made on whether to roll out the culls.

For further information see http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/backbench-business-committee/news/mps-debate-the-badger-cull/

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
RCVS pays tribute to well-loved equine vet

The RCVS and the Riding Establishments Subcommittee has paid tribute to well-loved veterinary surgeon and riding establishment inspector, Rebecca Hamilton-Fletcher MRCVS.

Linda Belton MRCVS, RCVS President, said: "I, along with my colleagues on the RESC, RCVS Council, RCVS Standards Committee, as well as RCVS staff, was very saddened to hear of the sudden death of Rebecca, or Becca as we knew her, last week.

"She was a true advocate for equine welfare and in her many years on the RESC worked to continually improve the quality and consistency of riding establishment inspections, all in the interests of enhanced horse welfare and rider safety."