Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
EmailIphone Application    Posted: 29th November 2013
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.
Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Welfare group hits out at primate research review

Report into multiple neuroscience research procedures on primates sparks RSPCA

CONCERNS have been raised by the RSPCA over a published report into the impact of neuroscience research on primates.

The report, "Review of the assessment of cumulative severity and lifetime experience in non-human primates used in neuroscience research," by the former UK Animal Procedures Committee,  considers the long-term implications of procedures on primates.

RSPCA's chief scientific officer, Maggy Jennings, OBE, said: “It is extremely concerning that this report systematically underestimates the serious impact of neuroscience research on primates and the level of suffering involved.


“How anyone can think that confinement in cages, being subjected to repeated scientific procedures including surgery, the implantation of eye coils or head implants and electrodes, food and water deprivation, long periods of restraint, and the catalogue of other adverse effects listed causes anything other than severe suffering is completely beyond us.


The report provides the first detailed account into this sensitive area of animal research of the nature, incidence and severity of procedures and complications, including their cumulative impact.


According to the Government's Animals in Science Committee, which published the report, the review also identified issues specific to the concepts of cumulative severity and lifetime experience that should be subject to further and future debate.


Maggy Jennings added: "We will be reviewing the report and its recommendations in very close detail to ensure that where constructive recommendations have been made that could reduce primate suffering, that they are immediately implemented.”


www.gov.uk/government/publications/animal-procedures-committee-cumulative-severity-review

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.