Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Dog-robot interactions studied

Study looks at the social reactions of dogs 

Research published in the journal Animal Cognition has suggested that dogs interact more readily with robots that show social behaviour than those that are asocial.

An animal behaviour study tested 41 dogs, which were divided into two groups - those that were exposed to a "social" robot and those that were exposed to an "asocial" robot.

 

The robot does not look like a human, but resembles a piece of gym equipment with a white gloved hand that can make simple gestures and grasp objects.

 

It was programmed to either show social behaviour, such as calling a dog by its name, or to display asocial, machine-like behaviour.

 

The dogs in both groups first watched an interaction between their owner and a human experimenter, followed by an interaction between their owner and a robot.

 

Dogs in the social group saw a social interaction between the owner and robot, while the asocial group saw a non-social interaction. Both groups then interacted with first the robot, then their owner.

 

The human experimenter and robot then pointed out the location of some hidden food to the dogs in both groups.

 

Researchers found that while the dogs did not react to the social robot in the same way as they would a human owner, they did show positive social reactions. For example, the dogs spent more time near the social robot or gazing at its head than the asocial robot.

 

The dogs also had more trouble finding the food when a robot, rather than a human, pointed it out to them, but found the social robot's directions easier to follow than those of the asocial robot.

 

Image credit: Eniko Kubinyi 

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.