Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

BVA shares governance fears for VSA reform
BVA says that Defra should have consulted on a third option of the governance model.
The consultation on the VSA closed on 25 March.

The British Veterinary Association (BVA) has published its response to the government’s consultation on a new Veterinary Surgeons Act (VSA).

While broadly supporting the government’s proposals, the association voiced its concerns about the proposed governance model.

Under current proposals, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) would retain its status as ‘a Royal College that regulates’. BVA says that this approach ‘does not currently deliver clear separation of regulatory and professional leadership functions’.

However an alternative model, in which the RCVS acts solely as a regulator, has also been questioned by BVA.

BVA raised concern that this alternative proposal had not been accompanied by a clear plan for the provision and adequate funding of leadership functions. It says the consultation document did not fully explain how the separation of functions would be legislated.

It has suggested that Defra should have consulted on a third governance model. In this model, BVA proposes that RCVS’ regulatory functions are transferred to a ‘new’ regulatory body, while RCVS retains its professional leadership functions.

BVA has, however, voiced its support for many of Defra’s other proposals for the new Veterinary Surgeons Act.

This includes protection of titles for all members of the veterinary team, including veterinary nurses, as well as regulation of veterinary businesses, animal healthcare businesses and allied veterinary professionals. The proposals also replace the existing disciplinary process with a fitness to practice regime.

Rob Williams, BVA president, said: “For the reformed veterinary legislation to achieve its aims, we need an effective regulator whose remit is clear and trusted by both the public and the professions.

“Defra’s proposed models for governance fail either to fully explain to what extent the separation of regulatory and professional leadership functions would be enshrined in legislation, or how it would ensure continued provision and adequate funding for these. That’s why we’re calling on Defra to engage in further discussions with BVA, RCVS, BVNA and other key stakeholders on this issue. It’s vital that we get this right.”

BVA’s consultation response can be viewed here.

Image © Friends Stock/Shutterstock.com

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.