Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Organisations respond to CMA working papers
BVA says that the CMA must fully understand nuances in the sector.
Vet groups have shared their preliminary responses.

A number of veterinary groups have published preliminary responses to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) working papers.

The CMA released six working papers on 6 February, assessing the evidence it has gathered and the group’s emerging views. External research papers have also been shared on the case page.

Preliminary responses to the CMA’s working papers have already been published by leading veterinary organisations, including the British Veterinary Association (BVA), Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) and the Federation of Independent Veterinary Practices (FIVP).

BVA, RCVS and FIVP have each individually welcomed the CMA’s recognition of the contributions of individual veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses. In their overview document, the CMA said it commended veterinary professionals’ ‘dedication and commitment to pet owners’.

The CMA’s findings included a survey, in which 88 per cent of pet owners agreed that their veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses offered the highest standard of care to their pets.

There was also mutual agreement from the organisations on the CMA’s comments on the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966. The inquiry group stated that the legislation had not kept up with changes in the industry, particularly changes to the ownership of practices.

This was well-received by all three organisations, with RCVS’ response stating: “We are acutely aware that the regulatory workarounds we have needed to put in place over recent years to compensate for this outdated legislation, such as our voluntary Practice Standards Scheme and the Veterinary Client Mediation Service, can only go so far until such times as new legislation is enacted by parliament.”

However, in their preliminary responses, the organisations have raised some concern about the limitations of the CMA inquiry’s findings.

BVA’s response flags the importance of the CMA inquiry group understanding the nuances of the veterinary sector. It particularly references key services such as out of hours treatment and referrals, and its hopes that future remedies do not lead to a reduction in choice for clients.

FIVP business development manager Rita Dingwall said: “The CMA clearly have been listening to concerns raised by FIVP and others and in their overview document appear to understand the complex nature of the veterinary sector.

“The overarching consideration in this process is animal welfare and FIVP will continue to press this point in the many nuances of the investigation.”

BVA, FIVP, BSAVA and BVNA will present full evidence to the CMA at a formal hearing in March.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

VMD responds to Solensia injection concerns

News Story 1
 The VMD has added anaphylaxis to the SPC of Solensia 7 mg/ml Solution for Injection for Cats.

It says that this is a rare side effect, with such adverse events affecting fewer than three animals for every 1000 doses of Solensia sold.

Solensia is used to alleviate osteoarthritis pain in cats. It contains the active ingredient frunevetmab.

Anaphylaxis joins effects such as alopecia, dermatitis, pruritus on the list of adverse effects.

The VMD says that is constantly reviewing adverse event data for all medicines. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
More bird housing measures introduced in England

The Animal & Plant Health Agency (APHA) is to enforce mandatory housing measures in five more regions, as it tackles the spread of avian influenza in kept and wild birds across England.

From 16 February the measures will apply to Cheshire, Herefordshire, Lancashire, Merseyside and Worcestershire. The regions join eight other locations which are already following the measures.

Bird keepers in these areas must house their birds, as well as following strict biosecurity measures. Any locations within a Protection Zone outside these areas must also keep birds housed.

An Avian Influenza Protection Zone, mandating enhanced biosecurity measures, remains in place across Great Britain. On 10 February, APHA also banned the gatherings of poultry, galliforme and anseriforme birds in England, Scotland and Wales

All disease control zones can be checked on APHA's interactive map. Further guidance on additional housing measures can be found here.