Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Supermarkets lack effective antibiotic policies, antibiotic group says
Existing antibiotic policies only apply to supermarkets' own brand products.
Restrictions on antibiotic use are not applied to some branded or imported products.

Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics has accused supermarkets of lacking effective antibiotic policies, as the threat of antimicrobial resistance continues to rise.

Following a focus on the topic at the High-Level Meeting at the UN general assembly in New York, the group has highlighted how some supermarket supply chains might not be complying with legislation.

Antimicrobial resistance occurs when an overuse of antibiotics leads pathogens to develop a resistance to the antibiotics created to treat diseases, reducing the efficacy of these drugs. It has been described by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as ‘one of the top global public health and development threats’.

Throughout 2019, 1.27 million deaths around the world are estimated to be linked with antimicrobial resistance.

In May 2014, new legislation was introduced to restrict the use of antibiotics in farming. As part of the rules, farmers cannot use antibiotics to ‘compensate for poor hygiene, inadequate animal husbandry or poor farm management practices’.

The most recent report is showing some progress in reducing farm antibiotic use, with a 59 per cent reduction of farm antibiotic use since 2017.

There has also been an 81 per cent reduction in the use of critically important antibiotics since 2014.

However, although supermarkets do ask their suppliers to minimise use of antibiotics, they also allow suppliers to use intensive farming methods which increase levels of disease and antibiotic use. This includes fast-growing chickens, early weaning of piglets and routine tail docking of piglets.

Furthermore, existing antibiotic policies only apply to the supermarkets' own brand products, which usually originate in the UK. Branded products, which account for 48 per cent of grocery spending, and many imported animal products are not covered by the supermarkets' policies.

The antibiotic group reports that M&S follows antibiotic policy most closely, with their entire supply chain covered. Tesco and Waitrose are the next best performing supermarkets.

Iceland was the supermarket with the weakest policy, with no monitoring and no specific restrictions on critically important antibiotics. Ocado is yet to enforce a policy, although it says this will be introduced later this year.

The Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics is now calling on UK supermarkets to strengthen their antibiotic policies across all products and urges the government to ensure legislation on farm antibiotic use is fully implemented.

Cóilín Nunan, policy and science manager at the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, said: “Globally, it is estimated that about two thirds of all antibiotics are used in farm animals. Yet supermarkets are often not checking whether imported food they are selling has been produced with routine antibiotic use.

“This is unfair on UK farmers, who are held to higher standards. More importantly it is a threat to the health of consumers.”

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

New guidelines published for wildlife disease surveillance

News Story 1
 A set of international guidelines for disease surveillance in wildlife has been updated for the first time since 2015.

Released by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and the World Organisation for Animal Health, General Guidelines for Surveillance of Diseases, Pathogens and Toxic Agents in Free-ranging Wildlife is designed to help wildlife authorities and others working with wildlife carry out effective surveillance programmes.

The document, which cover areas including choosing appropriate strategies, safety and biosafety protocols, and ethical and legal considerations, can be read here.  

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Restricted zone extended after more bluetongue cases

After three new cases of bluetongue virus serotype 3 were detected along the Hertfordshire and Buckinghamshire border, the restricted zone has been extended.

The zone now includes Buckinghamshire and part of Berkshire, as well as Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, City of Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, East Sussex, Essex, Greater London, part of Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Kent, part of Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Norfolk, part of Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Suffolk, Surrey, and West Sussex.

Susceptible animals in the restricted zone should only be moved if it is essential. A specific licence is needed to move a susceptible animal from within the restricted zone to outside of the zone.

Bluetongue is a notifiable disease. Suspected cases must be reported on 03000 200 301 in England or 03003 038 268 in Wales. In Scotland, suspected cases should be reported to the local field services office. In Northern Ireland, suspected cases should be reported to the DAERA Helpline on 0300 200 7840 or by contacting the local DAERA Direct Veterinary Office.

A map of the areas where restrictions apply can be found here.