Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study tests impact of avian flu from cattle on mammals
The outbreak in dairy cattle has affected herds in 12 states in the USA.
Researchers found that respiratory transmission was ineffective.

An international team of researchers has found that a strain of the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus circulating in dairy cattle can induce severe disease in mice and ferrets when administered via intranasal inoculation.

The study also found that, while the virus did spread effectively between infected female mice and suckling pups through milk, the virus did not transmit efficiently between ferrets exposed to it via respiratory droplets.

The study was conducted by researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, and the universities of Shizuoka and Tokyo in Japan in response to the ongoing outbreak of avian flu in US dairy cattle.

The outbreak was first discovered in the USA in March this year. The virus has since been identified in herds in 12 states and four dairy workers have tested positive with mild symptoms. There have also been fatal infections in cats on farms and transmission to nearby poultry.

The researchers isolated the virus from infected cow milk and tested its ability to spread and cause disease in mice and ferrets, two species commonly used in influenza A studies. Ferrets exhibit similar clinical symptoms and immune responses to humans, providing researchers with a model of how a virus could affect people.

The study found that the virus was able to induce severe disease, and that infection can lead to systemic spread to non-respiratory tissues including the eye, mammary glad, teat and/or muscle.

The tests on the ability of the virus to spread, find that it did not do so efficiently through respiratory transmission. However, the researchers did find that the virus could bind to receptors that human influenza A viruses attach to, in addition to the receptors that avian influenza viruses attach to.

Prof Ash Banyard, a virologist at the UK’s Animal and Plant Health Agency, said: “The work by Eisfield et al uses well-established laboratory models to start to fill some of our gaps in understanding of the potential ability for the newly emerged clade of avian influenza in cattle in the US to transmit to humans.

“The data is robust and both models and approaches used are consistent with earlier studies and support the current thinking that human infection risk from this virus is low.

“This reflects what is being reported from America with only four reported human cases, all of which have been described as having only mild clinical disease with no evidence of onward spread.”

The study will be published in the journal Nature. An unedited version has been made available here to give early access to the study's findings.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

New guidelines published for wildlife disease surveillance

News Story 1
 A set of international guidelines for disease surveillance in wildlife has been updated for the first time since 2015.

Released by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and the World Organisation for Animal Health, General Guidelines for Surveillance of Diseases, Pathogens and Toxic Agents in Free-ranging Wildlife is designed to help wildlife authorities and others working with wildlife carry out effective surveillance programmes.

The document, which cover areas including choosing appropriate strategies, safety and biosafety protocols, and ethical and legal considerations, can be read here.  

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Restricted zone extended after more bluetongue cases

After three new cases of bluetongue virus serotype 3 were detected along the Hertfordshire and Buckinghamshire border, the restricted zone has been extended.

The zone now includes Buckinghamshire and part of Berkshire, as well as Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, City of Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, East Sussex, Essex, Greater London, part of Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Kent, part of Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Norfolk, part of Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Suffolk, Surrey, and West Sussex.

Susceptible animals in the restricted zone should only be moved if it is essential. A specific licence is needed to move a susceptible animal from within the restricted zone to outside of the zone.

Bluetongue is a notifiable disease. Suspected cases must be reported on 03000 200 301 in England or 03003 038 268 in Wales. In Scotland, suspected cases should be reported to the local field services office. In Northern Ireland, suspected cases should be reported to the DAERA Helpline on 0300 200 7840 or by contacting the local DAERA Direct Veterinary Office.

A map of the areas where restrictions apply can be found here.