Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Latest cost of living survey ‘worrying’ for horse owners
One respondent sacrificed food, heating and diesel to keep their horse
Eighty-one per cent were concerned about rising costs.

The National Equine Welfare Council has published the results of its survey, which investigated the effect of rising living costs on horse ownership.

It says that the survey, which was completed by over 6,000 horse owners in England, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, reveals a ‘worrying’ picture for horse keeping.

Eighty-one per cent of respondents expressed concern about the continued pressure that increased costs were putting on their finances. Meanwhile 39 per cent said that rising costs had a medium or high impact on their ability to keep their horse – meaning they had to make additional sacrifices to provide basic care.

The rising costs were spread across different elements of horse care, with 80 per cent reporting an increase in veterinary fees, 65 per cent in farrier services and 62 per cent in insurance costs.

This has led to 20 per cent of horse owners taking on an additional job, or increased hours to cover their horse’s care. Significantly, two per cent were considering giving their horse up to a charity due to the pressures and five per cent were considering euthanasing their animal.

An anonymous respondent said that they were unable to cover out-of-hours veterinary care, stabling or regular farrier visits. Another respondent said they couldn’t afford to keep their horse in work, and had therefore retired it to a field.

Despite the rising costs, horse ownership proved vital to the mental health of some owners. One respondent, now unable to work, was going without food, heating and diesel because their horse was so important to them.

For the first time, concerns about climate change and bad weather also featured in the free comment section of the survey.

Horse owners were concerned about how bad weather affected grazing, and the corresponding turnout challenges.

Rebecca Boulert, education officer at World Horse Welfare, said: “We know from last year’s research that many owners were just about coping, all possible cost savings had already been made, so they really were feeling the pressure.

“This year’s survey shows that these problems are just not going away.”

The full survey can be found here.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

BEVA gives RVNs right to vote

News Story 1
 The British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA) is to allow its registered veterinary nurse (RVN) members the right to vote.

RVN members will now be able to take part in key decision-making processes and stand for BEVA council.

Marie Rippingale, chair of BEVA's Nurse Committee, said: "I am very proud to be a part of BEVA.

"This change will help to empower nurses to speak up and contribute, but more importantly, it will give them an opportunity to collaborate with other members of the equine veterinary profession to bring about change that is positive for all." 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Bluetongue vaccines comparison table produced for vets

The Ruminant Health and Welfare Group has produced a comparison table on the vaccines available in the UK for bluetongue virus serotype 3.

The three vaccines, which have been permitted for use by the secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs, claim to reduce symptoms rather than prevent animals from catching the disease.

The table looks at a range of different factors for each vaccine, including their use in sheep and cattle, their use during pregnancy, adverse events, and storage requirements.

The comparisons have been compiled by Flock Health in collaboration with the British Veterinary Association, the British Cattle Veterinary Association, the Sheep Veterinary Society, the British Deer Veterinary Association, the British Camelid Association, and the Goat Vet Society.

The comparison table, and further information on the bluetongue vaccines, can be accessed here.