Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Lameness most common finding in PPEs, research reveals
The analysis revealed that 57.1 per cent of the horses examined had prejudicial findings.

Pre-purchase examinations of horses are often debated in the equine industry.

New research from the Royal Veterinary College (RVC) has revealed that lameness is the most common prejudicial finding in pre-purchase examinations (PPE) of horses.

Researchers examined 133 PPE certificates of a mixed, non-racing population of horses in an effort to study the merits of five-stage vetting (5SV) and two-stage vetting (2SV).

PPEs are performed by veterinary surgeons for prospective horse buyers, and are designed to identify prejudicial findings which may indicate the horse is unsuitable for its intended use. However, while PPEs usually follow a standardised process, they are often subjective and based on the veterinary surgeon’s opinion at that time.

The study examined PPE certificates from three first opinion practices, assessing the examination format, diagnostic imaging, purchase price, animal signalment, horse’s intended use, the outcome, and the findings.

The analysis revealed that 57.1 per cent of the horses examined had prejudicial findings, with lameness found as the primary prejudicial finding in 55.3 per cent of cases. Diagnostic imaging findings were found in 14.5 per cent of cases, respiratory system findings in 6.6 per cent of cases, with skin conditions and cardiac abnormalities each found in less than six per cent of cases.

The researchers also reviewed when different examination formats, whether 5SV or 2SV, were used to assess the horses.

It was found that 68.5 per cent of the horses underwent a 5SV, compared to 34.1 per cent taking a 2SV. Horses with a higher purchase price were found to be the most likely to undergo a 5SV, a well as being the most likely to have pre-purchase radiography and have prejudicial findings identified.

The researchers say that their findings could encourage further research into PPE formats, which could better inform prospective horse buyers.

Dr Jason Tupper, head of equine practice at the RVC, said: “A pre-purchase examination can discover a number of issues before buying a horse. This study reveals lameness to be the commonest issue.

“Few horses are perfect when it comes to temperament and health. The vetting process determines the issues and the vet can then help the purchaser weigh up their significance and decide if they can compromise and accept the issues or not."

The full study can be found in the Equine Veterinary Journal.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New guidance for antibiotic use in rabbits

New best practice guidance on the responsible use of antibiotics in rabbits has been published by the BSAVA in collaboration with the Rabbit Welfare Association & Fund (RWA&F).

The guidance is free and has been produced to help veterinary practitioners select the most appropriate antibiotic for rabbits. It covers active substance, dose and route of administration all of which are crucial factors when treating rabbits owing to the risk of enterotoxaemia.

For more information and to access the guide, visit the BSAVALibrary.