Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

RCVS announces new complaints investigation processes
The CEG stage of the process has been replaced by Stage One Preliminary Investigation Committee.
Cases will be considered by the Preliminary Investigation Committees from the outset. 

A new, streamlined concerns investigation process, in which cases are considered by the Preliminary Investigation Committees from the outset, will come into force on Saturday (1 October), the RCVS has announced.

Under the former system, complaints about a veterinary surgeon or veterinary nurse were considered by a Case Examiner Group at Stage One to ascertain whether there was an arguable case of serious professional misconduct. Should the CEG decide the matter was disputable, it would pass to Stage Two for consideration by the Preliminary Investigation Committees. 

Under the new system, the CEG stage of the process has been replaced by Stage One Preliminary Investigation Committees (PIC). The PIC will consider from the outset whether there is a realistic prospect that the alleged conduct constitutes serious professional misconduct and that there is sufficient evidence to prove this. 

The new Stage One PIC will consist of professionals, laypeople, and an RCVS Case Manager, who will also be the initial point of contact for persons raising concerns. Witnesses and responders in the case will support the committees in their investigations. 

RCVS registrar and director of legal services, Eleanor Ferguson, commented: “By keeping to one consistent threshold for serious professional misconduct throughout the concerns investigation process, we hope that these changes will help to simplify our investigations while still ensuring that the process remains robust and thorough. 

“We also hope that, in time and when the changes are fully bedded in, we may also see a swifter resolution to some cases, as concerns that may previously been referred on to Stage Two of the process can now be closed at Stage One.” 

If a Stage One PIC cannot close a case, it will refer it to a Stage Two PIC to collect additional information and evidence. The Stage Two PIC will decide if there is a realistic prospect of finding serious professional misconduct and if it is in the public interest for the case to go to Stage Three for a full, public, Disciplinary Committee hearing. 

“The introduction of these new stages is the first step in the programme of reform of our concerns investigation and disciplinary processes,” Eleanor adds. “Next year we will be looking to introduce our Charter Case Protocol which will be a way of resolving some less serious cases of alleged misconduct where it would not necessarily be in the public interest to hold a full Disciplinary Committee hearing.” 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
New guidance for antibiotic use in rabbits

New best practice guidance on the responsible use of antibiotics in rabbits has been published by the BSAVA in collaboration with the Rabbit Welfare Association & Fund (RWA&F).

The guidance is free and has been produced to help veterinary practitioners select the most appropriate antibiotic for rabbits. It covers active substance, dose and route of administration all of which are crucial factors when treating rabbits owing to the risk of enterotoxaemia.

For more information and to access the guide, visit the BSAVALibrary.