Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Zoo culture influences keeper-animal attachment
"Understanding what impacts keeper-animal relationships is essential" - Professor Vicky Melfi.
New research explores animal attachment among zookeepers.

Hartpury University's Animal and Agricultural Research Centre has discovered that zoo culture has an influence on the strength of keeper-animal attachment.

Researchers at the university explored levels of animal attachment among zookeepers using the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). Using data from 180 keepers, researchers found that the keeper's scores regarding their own pets were comparable with the general public, however, the keeper's scores regarding the zoo animals in their care varied significantly by institution.

The variation between scores in different institutions suggests that the culture of each zoo influences the level of attachment between keeper and zoo animal, and this study is the first time zoo culture has been identified.

Published in Zoo Biology, the study also found that the zoo animal attachment LAPS scores were higher in women than men, and no difference in attachment was found between species.

Professor Vicky Melfi, who led the research, explained the importance of the work: “Understanding what impacts keeper-animal relationships is essential, as they impact animal and human wellbeing, as well as the safety of the keepers themselves.

“By understanding what affects the relationship between keepers and their animals, collections can actively work to improve the welfare and wellbeing of the animals in their care while also improving overall job satisfaction among keepers.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.