Cookie use on MRCVSonline
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Equine vets vote against corporatisation
"Whether we like it or not corporatisation of equine practices is on the rise" - BEVA president, John Chitty.
BEVA Congress debates growing trend

Seventy-two per cent of equine vets disagree with motion that corporatisation is inevitable and will benefit vets and clients, according to a debate at BEVA Congress.

The trend for the corporatisation of veterinary practices is growing; in the past two years, the UK’s biggest veterinary group CVS has acquired 32 equine practices. However, it remains a controversial process with strong views from both sides about the potential advantages or disadvantages to vets, their clients and their patients.

The debate saw Keith Chandler, former BEVA president and member of the acquisitions team at Independent Vet Care and Karl Holliman, partner and director at Cliffe Veterinary Group, arguing for corporatisation.  Andrew Harrison, a partner at Three Counties Equine Hospital and Tim Greet, who recently retired as an equine partner at Rossdales, took the opposing side.

It opened with a fairly equal balance of views, with 44 per cent voting for corporatisation and 56 per cent against. An hour of candid discussion, however, served to reinforce the opposing side.

BEVA president Jon Pycock said: “Whether we like it or not corporatisation of equine practices is on the rise. But it shouldn’t mean that the future isn’t going to be viable for independents too as there is a role for both to co-exist. Importantly, this should mean that vets and their clients will both continue to have choices.”

The pro-corporatisation team advocated that commercial and business advantages, together with the scale and diversity of a corporate, can give vets greater potential for a more flexible career path and advancement within the industry, and a more sustainable working career in equine practice. Karl Holliman highlighted that corporates enable greater purchasing power, better health and safety resources, improved career structure and the freedom for employed vets to focus on clinical expertise.

The anti-corporatisation panel said that clinical rather than commercial elements drive practice and partners are light on their feet and can respond quickly to decision without referring to “a ponderous corporate hierarchy”. Tim Greet argued that clients like continuity and the quickest way to lose them would be to send in different vets. He added that a bespoke approach to client care was needed rather than hard targeting.

The session closed with a significant majority of 72 per cent of the audience disagreeing with the motion ‘Corporatisation is inevitable and will benefit vets and their clients’.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Giraffe Conservation Foundation named BVNA’s charity of the year

News Story 1
 BVNA president Wendy Nevins has named The Giraffe Conservation Foundation as the association’s charity of the year for 2017/2018.

The Giraffe Conservation Foundation dedicates its work to a sustainable future for wild giraffe populations. Wendy Nevins said: ‘I have chosen the Giraffe Conservation Foundation for the BVNA Charity of the Year because I have always thought Giraffes were magnificent animals.

‘I also think it is important that we look at the wider issue of conservation and education across all species.’  

News Shorts
Scientists win award for openness in animal research

UK scientists have won an award for the 360ş Laboratory Animal Tours project, which offered the public an online, interactive tour of four research facilities that are usually restricted access.

The project won a public engagement award at the Understanding Animal Research (UAR) Openness Awards, which recognise UK research facilities for transparency on their use of animals in research, as well as innovation in communicating with the public.

The tour was created by the Pirbright Institute, the University of Oxford, the University of Bristol and MRC Harwell Institute.