Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Pigeons and humans gamble for rewards
pigeon
Researchers say the findings highlight the importance of past wins and losses in gambling psychology.
Humans share risk-taking psychology with pigeons, study finds

Scientists say humans have the same basic psychology as pigeons when it comes to risk taking.

According to new research published in Biology Letters, both humans and pigeons were 35 per cent more likely to take a risk for the chance to achieve a high-value reward than a low-value reward.

"Humans and pigeons react in similar ways when faced with risky decisions because equivalent mental processes are driving their behaviour," explained lead researcher Dr Elliot Ludvig from the University of Warwick's Department of Psychology.

Researchers argue that their findings demonstrate the importance of past wins and losses in influencing our future gambling decisions.

"Both humans and pigeons were shown to be less risk averse for high rewards then they were for low rewards and this is linked to our past memories and experiences of making risky decisions," said Dr Ludvig.

“When people gamble, they often rely on past experiences with risk and rewards to make decisions. What we found in this study is that both pigeons used these past experiences in very similar ways to guide their future gambling decisions - any big wins we’ve had in the past are memorable and stand-out when we are making our decision to gamble again”.

During the tests, the human and pigeon subjects were given four options - two leading to high-value rewards and two low-value rewards. Each reward level had a safe option with a guaranteed fixed reward and a risky option with a 50/50 option of gaining a better or worse reward.
 
Explaining the possible reasons for these similarities, Dr Ludvig said: “Birds are distantly related to humans, yet we still share the same basic psychology that drives risk-taking. This may be due to a shared common ancestry or similar evolutionary pressures”.
 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

RCVS Knowledge appoints Veterinary Evidence editor-in-chief

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has welcomed Professor Peter Cockcroft as editor-in-chief for Veterinary Evidence.

A world-renowned expert in evidence-based veterinary medicine, Prof Cockcroft will lead the strategic development and editorial quality of the open-access journal. He was previously in the role from 2017-2020.

Katie Mantell, CEO of RCVS Knowledge, said: "We are excited about the extensive knowledge of evidence-based veterinary medicine and clinical veterinary research that Peter brings, and we look forward to working with him over this next phase of the journal's development." 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
CVS Group hit by cyber attack

CVS Group, which owns more than 450 veterinary practices in the UK, has been hit by a cyber attack.

In a statement, the group said the incident involved unauthorised external access to a limited number of its IT systems. As soon as the attack was discovered, the group took its IT systems temporarily offline, causing 'considerable operational disruption'.

It has warned that the security steps taken and ongoing plans to move its operational systems and IT infrastructure to the Cloud are likely to have an ongoing impact over a number of weeks.

Due to the risk that personal information was accessed, CVS has informed the Information Commissioner's Office. The company is working with third party consultants to investigate the incident.